Re: [PATCH net-next v9 13/15] net: phylink: introduce phylink_fwnode_phy_connect()
From: <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-15 20:18:56
Also in:
lkml, netdev
Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 01:53:59PM +0300, Ioana Ciornei kirjoitti:
From: Calvin Johnson <redacted> Define phylink_fwnode_phy_connect() to connect phy specified by a fwnode to a phylink instance.
...
+/**
+ * phylink_fwnode_phy_connect() - connect the PHY specified in the fwnode.
+ * @pl: a pointer to a &struct phylink returned from phylink_create()
+ * @fwnode: a pointer to a &struct fwnode_handle.
+ * @flags: PHY-specific flags to communicate to the PHY device driver
+ *
+ * Connect the phy specified @fwnode to the phylink instance specified
+ * by @pl.
+ *
+ * Returns 0 on success or a negative errno.
+ */
+int phylink_fwnode_phy_connect(struct phylink *pl,
+ struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
+ u32 flags)
+{
+ struct fwnode_handle *phy_fwnode;
+ struct phy_device *phy_dev;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Fixed links and 802.3z are handled without needing a PHY */
+ if (pl->cfg_link_an_mode == MLO_AN_FIXED ||
+ (pl->cfg_link_an_mode == MLO_AN_INBAND &&
+ phy_interface_mode_is_8023z(pl->link_interface)))
+ return 0;
+
+ phy_fwnode = fwnode_get_phy_node(fwnode);
+ if (IS_ERR(phy_fwnode)) {
+ if (pl->cfg_link_an_mode == MLO_AN_PHY)
+ return -ENODEV;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ phy_dev = fwnode_phy_find_device(phy_fwnode);
+ /* We're done with the phy_node handle */
+ fwnode_handle_put(phy_fwnode);As per previous mail, who and when acquire this reference counting? Can it be possible that caller will never call phylink_fwnode_phy_connect() and hence reference counting will become disbalances? We need to fix all this before the release.
+ if (!phy_dev)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ ret = phy_attach_direct(pl->netdev, phy_dev, flags,
+ pl->link_interface);
+ if (ret) {
+ phy_device_free(phy_dev);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = phylink_bringup_phy(pl, phy_dev, pl->link_config.interface);
+ if (ret)
+ phy_detach(phy_dev);
+
+ return ret;
+}-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko