Re: [PATCH net-next v9 08/15] net: mdiobus: Introduce fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy()
From: <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-15 20:16:06
Also in:
lkml, netdev
Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 01:53:54PM +0300, Ioana Ciornei kirjoitti:
From: Calvin Johnson <redacted> Introduce fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy() to register PHYs on the mdiobus. From the compatible string, identify whether the PHY is c45 and based on this create a PHY device instance which is registered on the mdiobus. Along with fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy() also introduce fwnode_find_mii_timestamper() and fwnode_mdiobus_phy_device_register() since they are needed. While at it, also use the newly introduced fwnode operation in of_mdiobus_phy_device_register().
I understand that this patch series is applied, but I think we have a problem that has to be fixed before the release. See below for the details. ...
+int fwnode_mdiobus_phy_device_register(struct mii_bus *mdio,
+ struct phy_device *phy,
+ struct fwnode_handle *child, u32 addr)
+{
+ int rc;
+
+ rc = fwnode_irq_get(child, 0);
+ if (rc == -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ return rc;
+
+ if (rc > 0) {
+ phy->irq = rc;
+ mdio->irq[addr] = rc;
+ } else {
+ phy->irq = mdio->irq[addr];
+ }
+
+ if (fwnode_property_read_bool(child, "broken-turn-around"))
+ mdio->phy_ignore_ta_mask |= 1 << addr;
+
+ fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reset-assert-us",
+ &phy->mdio.reset_assert_delay);
+ fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reset-deassert-us",
+ &phy->mdio.reset_deassert_delay);
+
+ /* Associate the fwnode with the device structure so it
+ * can be looked up later
+ */+ fwnode_handle_get(child);
We take a reference counting here. Who and when should drop it?
+ phy->mdio.dev.fwnode = child;
+
+ /* All data is now stored in the phy struct;
+ * register it
+ */
+ rc = phy_device_register(phy);
+ if (rc) {
+ fwnode_handle_put(child);
+ return rc;
+ }
+
+ dev_dbg(&mdio->dev, "registered phy %p fwnode at address %i\n",
+ child, addr);
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(fwnode_mdiobus_phy_device_register);
+
+int fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy(struct mii_bus *bus,
+ struct fwnode_handle *child, u32 addr)
+{
+ struct mii_timestamper *mii_ts = NULL;
+ struct phy_device *phy;
+ bool is_c45 = false;
+ u32 phy_id;
+ int rc;
+
+ mii_ts = fwnode_find_mii_timestamper(child);
+ if (IS_ERR(mii_ts))
+ return PTR_ERR(mii_ts);
+
+ rc = fwnode_property_match_string(child, "compatible",
+ "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45");
+ if (rc >= 0)
+ is_c45 = true;
+
+ if (is_c45 || fwnode_get_phy_id(child, &phy_id))
+ phy = get_phy_device(bus, addr, is_c45);
+ else
+ phy = phy_device_create(bus, addr, phy_id, 0, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
+ unregister_mii_timestamper(mii_ts);
+ return PTR_ERR(phy);
+ }
+
+ if (is_acpi_node(child)) {
+ phy->irq = bus->irq[addr];
+
+ /* Associate the fwnode with the device structure so it
+ * can be looked up later.
+ */
+ phy->mdio.dev.fwnode = child;
+
+ /* All data is now stored in the phy struct, so register it */
+ rc = phy_device_register(phy);
+ if (rc) {
+ phy_device_free(phy);+ fwnode_handle_put(phy->mdio.dev.fwnode);
We dropped reference counting here, but who and when acquired it?
+ return rc;
+ }
+ } else if (is_of_node(child)) {
+ rc = fwnode_mdiobus_phy_device_register(bus, phy, child, addr);
+ if (rc) {
+ unregister_mii_timestamper(mii_ts);
+ phy_device_free(phy);
+ return rc;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* phy->mii_ts may already be defined by the PHY driver. A
+ * mii_timestamper probed via the device tree will still have
+ * precedence.
+ */
+ if (mii_ts)
+ phy->mii_ts = mii_ts;
+ return 0;
+}-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko