Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 6 authors, 2021-02-03

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86,sched: On AMD EPYC set freq_max = max_boost in schedutil invariant formula

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-02-02 19:03:35
Also in: linux-pm, lkml

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 9:47 PM Giovanni Gherdovich [off-list ref] wrote:
[cut]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Fixes: 41ea667227ba ("x86, sched: Calculate frequency invariance for AMD systems")
Fixes: 976df7e5730e ("x86, sched: Use midpoint of max_boost and max_P for frequency invariance on AMD EPYC")
Reported-by: Michael Larabel <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Giovanni Gherdovich <redacted>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c   | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c        |  3 ++
 include/linux/cpufreq.h          |  5 +++
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c |  8 +++-
 4 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index 1e4fbb002a31..2378bc1bf2c4 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -27,6 +27,10 @@

 #include <acpi/processor.h>

+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB
Why is the #ifdef needed here?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+#include <acpi/cppc_acpi.h>
+#endif
+
 #include <asm/msr.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
@@ -628,11 +632,57 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_blacklist(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 }
 #endif

+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB
+static bool amd_max_boost(unsigned int max_freq,
+                         unsigned int *max_boost)
+{
+       struct cppc_perf_caps perf_caps;
+       u64 highest_perf, nominal_perf, perf_ratio;
+       int ret;
+
+       ret = cppc_get_perf_caps(0, &perf_caps);
+       if (ret) {
+               pr_debug("Could not retrieve perf counters (%d)\n", ret);
+               return false;
+       }
+
+       highest_perf = perf_caps.highest_perf;
+       nominal_perf = perf_caps.nominal_perf;
+
+       if (!highest_perf || !nominal_perf) {
+               pr_debug("Could not retrieve highest or nominal performance\n");
+               return false;
+       }
+
+       perf_ratio = div_u64(highest_perf * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE, nominal_perf);
+       if (perf_ratio <= SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) {
+               pr_debug("Either perf_ratio is 0, or nominal >= highest performance\n");
+               return false;
+       }
+
+       *max_boost = max_freq * perf_ratio >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
+       if (!*max_boost) {
+               pr_debug("max_boost seems to be zero\n");
+               return false;
+       }
+
+       return true;
+}
+#else
+static bool amd_max_boost(unsigned int max_freq,
+                         unsigned int *max_boost)
+{
+       return false;
+}
+#endif
+
 static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
        unsigned int i;
        unsigned int valid_states = 0;
        unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
+       unsigned int freq, max_freq = 0;
+       unsigned int max_boost;
        struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data;
        unsigned int result = 0;
        struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(policy->cpu);
@@ -779,15 +829,25 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
                    freq_table[valid_states-1].frequency / 1000)
                        continue;

+               freq = perf->states[i].core_frequency * 1000;
                freq_table[valid_states].driver_data = i;
-               freq_table[valid_states].frequency =
-                   perf->states[i].core_frequency * 1000;
+               freq_table[valid_states].frequency = freq;
+
+               if (freq > max_freq)
+                       max_freq = freq;
+
                valid_states++;
        }
        freq_table[valid_states].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
        policy->freq_table = freq_table;
        perf->state = 0;

+       if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD &&
+           amd_max_boost(max_freq, &max_boost)) {
+               policy->cpuinfo.max_boost = max_boost;
Why not to set max_freq to max_boost instead?

This value is set once at the init time anyway and schedutil would use
max_boost instead of max_freq anyway.

Also notice that the static branch is global and the max_boost value
for different CPUs may be different, at least in theory.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+               static_branch_enable(&cpufreq_amd_max_boost);
+       }
+
        switch (perf->control_register.space_id) {
        case ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO:
                /*
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index d0a3525ce27f..b96677f6b57e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2721,6 +2721,9 @@ int cpufreq_boost_enabled(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_boost_enabled);

+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(cpufreq_amd_max_boost);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_amd_max_boost);
+
 /*********************************************************************
  *               REGISTER / UNREGISTER CPUFREQ DRIVER                *
  *********************************************************************/
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 9c8b7437b6cd..341cac76d254 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -40,9 +40,14 @@ enum cpufreq_table_sorting {
        CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_DESCENDING
 };

+DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(cpufreq_amd_max_boost);
+
+#define cpufreq_driver_has_max_boost() static_branch_unlikely(&cpufreq_amd_max_boost)
+
 struct cpufreq_cpuinfo {
        unsigned int            max_freq;
        unsigned int            min_freq;
+       unsigned int            max_boost;

        /* in 10^(-9) s = nanoseconds */
        unsigned int            transition_latency;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 6931f0cdeb80..541f3db3f576 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -159,8 +159,12 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy,
                                  unsigned long util, unsigned long max)
 {
        struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy;
-       unsigned int freq = arch_scale_freq_invariant() ?
-                               policy->cpuinfo.max_freq : policy->cur;
+       unsigned int freq, max_freq;
+
+       max_freq = cpufreq_driver_has_max_boost() ?
+                       policy->cpuinfo.max_boost : policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
+
+       freq = arch_scale_freq_invariant() ? max_freq : policy->cur;

        freq = map_util_freq(util, freq, max);

--
2.26.2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help