On Friday, November 16, 2012 10:09:34 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 09:02:36PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
quoted
Ah, that's what's called by acpi_dev_get_resources(). But what about writing
it this way:
static int acpi_i2c_find_child_address(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
{
if (ares->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_SERIAL_BUS) {
struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus *sb;
sb = &ares->data.i2c_serial_bus;
if (sb->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_SERIAL_TYPE_I2C) {
struct acpi_i2c_find *i2c_find = data;
if (sb->slave_address == i2c_find->addr)
i2c_find->found = true;
}
}
/* Tell the ACPI core to skip this resource. */
return 1;
}
Not a problem at all, I'll do it like above and also with the SPI case.
I'll wait til tomorrow for more comments and post v3 unless there are
objections.
OK, thanks!
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.