On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Huang Ying [off-list ref] wrote:

On 08/29/2011 10:08 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

quoted

On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Huang Ying [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 08/27/2011 01:10 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

quoted

Use the normal %pR-like format for MMIO and I/O port ranges.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c |    8 ++++----
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c
index 8041248..8bd5f1a 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c

@@ -460,9 +460,9 @@ int apei_resources_request(struct apei_resources *resources,

                                     desc);
              if (!r) {
                      pr_err(APEI_PFX
-             "Can not request iomem region <%016llx-%016llx> for GARs.\n",
+             "Can not request [mem %#010llx-%#010llx] for %s registers\n",

Why %#010llx instead of %#016llx?

Because %#010llx is effectively what we use for %pR.  Two characters
for "0x", then eight for the value.  IMHO, sixteen uninterrupted hex
characters is too hard to read.

That is reasonable. Thanks.

Acked-by: Huang Ying <redacted>

Disregard this patch; I'll send a v2 that does the same for another APEI file.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html