On Sat, 2014-07-12 at 12:28 -0700, Greg KH wrote:

On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 11:29:37AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:

quoted

On Sat, 2014-07-12 at 10:55 -0700, Greg KH wrote:

quoted

Yes, the warnings are all due to line-length, but Joe, you shouldn't add
a patch that causes more checkpatch warnings than before :)

Yeah, that was intentional though.

This script does a series of relatively discrete changes.

Lindent would more or less work, but it's _horrible_ at
wrapping overlong lines and merges all types of changes
together.

Oh I agree, I don't want to see Lindent, but maybe, if the patch adds
checkpatch warnings, it should be at least "flagged" as maybe a problem?

The script I submitted does run checkpatch
before any commit is done.

Would you want to be on the receiving end of this patch script?

You might have noticed I don't have a kernel.org
account.