Re: [PATCH 0/2] Don't show PF_IO_WORKER in /proc/<pid>/task/
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Date: 2021-03-25 20:33:28
Also in:
lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2021-03-25 · Re: [PATCH 0/2] Don't show PF_IO_WORKER in /proc/<pid>/task/ · Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
- 2021-03-25 · Re: [PATCH 0/2] Don't show PF_IO_WORKER in /proc/<pid>/task/ · Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
- 2021-03-25 · Re: [PATCH 0/2] Don't show PF_IO_WORKER in /proc/<pid>/task/ · Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
- 2021-03-25 · Re: [PATCH 0/2] Don't show PF_IO_WORKER in /proc/<pid>/task/ · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
- 2021-03-25 · Re: [PATCH 0/2] Don't show PF_IO_WORKER in /proc/<pid>/task/ · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
I didn't even try to read this series yet, will try tomorrow. But sorry, I can't resist... On 03/25, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 3/25/21 1:33 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:quoted
Jens Axboe [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Hi, Stefan reports that attaching to a task with io_uring will leave gdb very confused and just repeatedly attempting to attach to the IO threads, even though it receives an -EPERM every time.
Heh. As expected :/
And arguably it _is_ a gdb bug, but...
Why do you think so? Oleg.