Re: [PATCH 0/2] Don't show PF_IO_WORKER in /proc/<pid>/task/
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: 2021-03-25 19:47:45
Also in:
lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2021-03-25 · Re: [PATCH 0/2] Don't show PF_IO_WORKER in /proc/<pid>/task/ · Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
- 2021-03-25 · Re: [PATCH 0/2] Don't show PF_IO_WORKER in /proc/<pid>/task/ · Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
- 2021-03-25 · Re: [PATCH 0/2] Don't show PF_IO_WORKER in /proc/<pid>/task/ · Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
- 2021-03-25 · Re: [PATCH 0/2] Don't show PF_IO_WORKER in /proc/<pid>/task/ · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
- 2021-03-25 · Re: [PATCH 0/2] Don't show PF_IO_WORKER in /proc/<pid>/task/ · Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
On 3/25/21 1:42 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:38 PM Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
I don't know what the gdb logic is, but maybe there's some other option that makes gdb not react to them?.. maybe we could have a different name for them under the task/ subdirectory, for example (not just the pid)? Although that probably messes up 'ps' too..
Heh, I can try, but my guess is that it would mess up _something_, if not ps/top. -- Jens Axboe