On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 11:01:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Here's a resend of that final patch (not just a squash, because the
commit message mentioned the chmod).
Makes sense.
These 6/5 and 7/5 are probably better squashed into 5/5 than left as
"oops that was bad, so here is a preliminary clean-up to make the
fix easier (6/5), and here is the fix of the fifth step (7/5)", no?
I don't think it is the fault of 5/5 at all (which carefully tried to
maintain the NULL behavior). The problem fixed by 7/5 existed before my
series.
In theory that fix _could_ come earlier in the series, but it's actually
much easier to fix after 5/5, because we have a single spot to error
check.
-Peff