Hi Harald

On 30/06/2026 19:38, Harald Nordgren wrote:

I want to avoid creating drift between this and the format of 'git
rebase -i', so if we want to change this, maybe better to change both
at a later point instead?

The reason we're introducing the history command is to experiment with 
providing a better user interface for rewriting history without being 
bound by the limitations of "git rebase". So I think it would entirely 
appropriate to try a different format for the squash message here. If it 
turns out to be a success then we can see if we want to use it in "git 
rebase" as well.

Thanks

Phillip