Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] builtin/gc: use designated field initializers for maintenance tasks

Patrick Steinhardt [off-list ref] writes:

Convert the array of maintenance tasks to use designated field
initializers. This makes it easier to add more fields to the struct
without having to modify all tasks.

I was wondering why we don't catch missing field initializers when not
using designators. Seems like we explicitly set
'-Wno-missing-field-initializers'. Perhaps something to slowly tackle
over time.

The patch looks good.

[snip]