Thread (24 messages) flat view 24 messages, 3 authors, 2025-02-06

Re: [GSoC][PATCH v4 1/5] remote: rename function omit_name_by_refspec

From: Karthik Nayak <hidden>
Date: 2025-02-06 10:13:53

Meet Soni [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 at 14:30, Karthik Nayak [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Meet Soni [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
diff --git a/remote.h b/remote.h
index bda10dd5c8..66ee53411d 100644
--- a/remote.h
+++ b/remote.h
@@ -261,11 +261,7 @@ int resolve_remote_symref(struct ref *ref, struct ref *list);
  */
 struct ref *ref_remove_duplicates(struct ref *ref_map);

-/*
- * Check whether a name matches any negative refspec in rs. Returns 1 if the
- * name matches at least one negative refspec, and 0 otherwise.
- */
-int omit_name_by_refspec(const char *name, struct refspec *rs);
+int refname_matches_negative_refspec_item(const char *refname, struct refspec *rs);
Nit: The first sentence is now duplicated by the function name as
mentioned in the commit message. But aren't we loosing information by
removing the second sentence?
Correct. I considered keeping the second sentence for clarity, but that other
function signatures in the codebase don’t include comments solely describing
return values. To maintain consistency with the existing style, I
opted to remove
it. Let me know if you think an alternative approach would be better!
I think its okay as-is for now :)
quoted
quoted
 /*
  * Remove all entries in the input list which match any negative refspec in
--
2.34.1

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help