On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 04:29:50PM +0000, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:

[snip]

+static int fill_missing_blobs(const char *path UNUSED,
+			      struct oid_array *list,
+			      enum object_type type,
+			      void *data)
+{
+	struct backfill_context *ctx = data;
+
+	if (type != OBJ_BLOB)
+		return 0;
+
+	for (size_t i = 0; i < list->nr; i++) {
+		off_t size = 0;
+		struct object_info info = OBJECT_INFO_INIT;
+		info.disk_sizep = &size;
+		if (oid_object_info_extended(ctx->repo,
+					     &list->oid[i],
+					     &info,
+					     OBJECT_INFO_FOR_PREFETCH) ||
+		    !size)

So this is the object existence test? Is there a reason why we don't use
`repo_has_object_file()`, or its `_with_flags()` variant if we need to
pass `OBJECT_INFO_FOR_PREFETCH`?

+			oid_array_append(&ctx->current_batch, &list->oid[i]);
+	}
+
+	if (ctx->current_batch.nr >= ctx->batch_size)
+		download_batch(ctx);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int do_backfill(struct backfill_context *ctx)
+{
+	struct rev_info revs;
+	struct path_walk_info info = PATH_WALK_INFO_INIT;
+	int ret;
+
+	repo_init_revisions(ctx->repo, &revs, "");
+	handle_revision_arg("HEAD", &revs, 0, 0);
+
+	info.blobs = 1;
+	info.tags = info.commits = info.trees = 0;

Nit: this should be unnecessary as PATH_WALK_INFO_INIT already
initialized those fields for us, right?

+	info.revs = &revs;
+	info.path_fn = fill_missing_blobs;
+	info.path_fn_data = ctx;
+
+	ret = walk_objects_by_path(&info);
+
+	/* Download the objects that did not fill a batch. */
+	if (!ret)
+		download_batch(ctx);
+
+	backfill_context_clear(ctx);

Nit: I think it's a bit funny that we're cleaning up the context over
here rather than in the caller.

Patrick