Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 2 authors, 2024-11-18

Re: [PATCH] t9101: Refactor test_expect_success format

From: Taylor Blau <hidden>
Date: 2024-11-01 14:42:33

On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 08:51:11AM +0100, Seyi Chamber wrote:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 21:15, Taylor Blau [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 10:45:53AM +0100, Seyi Kuforiji wrote:
quoted
The current script uses an outdated formatting style for
test_expect_success blocks, where each argument is separated by a
backslash and newline. This style can lead to readability issues and
makes it harder to maintain the script.

The modern style consolidates
the multi-line command arguments into a single quoted block, which
Strange line wrapping?
That error probably occurred while I was editing the message. Should I
edit and send an updated patch?
Please do so, thanks.
quoted
quoted
improves readability, maintainability, and aligns the code with current
coding standards.

Signed-off-by: Seyi Kuforiji <redacted>
---
 t/t9101-git-svn-props.sh | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
This does not apply cleanly on 'master', so I assume that you wanted it
based on sk/t9101-cleanup. That's fine, but please let me know in the
future in case it's every less obvious :-).

The changes themselves all look quite sensible, though.

Thanks,
Taylor
Thanks, Taylor for pointing out this issue. I have rebased my change
onto the latest master branch and resolved the conflicts for future
updates.
There is no specific need to rebase on top of current 'master' unless
failing to do so will cause the maintainer to see a conflicted state
when applying.

Unless told otherwise, I will apply new rounds of existing patch series
onto top of their original base.

Thanks,
Taylor
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help