Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] compat/mingw: support POSIX semantics for atomic renames
From: Johannes Sixt <hidden>
Date: 2024-10-27 16:31:08
Am 27.10.24 um 16:38 schrieb Patrick Steinhardt:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 02:23:28PM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote:quoted
Am 24.10.24 um 13:46 schrieb Patrick Steinhardt:quoted
Windows 10 has introduced the `FILE_RENAME_FLAG_POSIX_SEMANTICS` flag that allows us to fix this usecase [1]. When set, it is possible to rename a file over a preexisting file even when the target file still has handles open. Those handles must have been opened with the `FILE_SHARE_DELETE` flag, which we have ensured in the preceding commits.quoted
Careful readers might have noticed that [1] does not mention the aboveflag, but instead mentions `FILE_RENAME_POSIX_SEMANTICS`. This flag is not for use with `SetFileInformationByHandle()` though, which is what we use. And while the `FILE_RENAME_FLAG_POSIX_SEMANTICS` flag exists, it is not documented on [2] or anywhere else as far as I can tell.The Windows 10 SDK defines FILE_RENAME_FLAG_REPLACE_IF_EXISTS and FILE_RENAME_FLAG_POSIX_SEMANTICS for SetFileInformationByHandle(). That the documentation lacks "_FLAG_" in the names must be an error in the documentation. I found the mention of FILE_RENAME_POSIX_SEMANTICS quite distracting, because it is a flag to be used with CreateFileW() and basically only has to do with case-sensitivity, but nothing with POSIX semantics of renaming.I'd still prefer to mention this, because otherwise an astute reader might notice that I'm using a different flag name than what is documented in the docs and figure out that I defined the wrong flag name.
Ah, I was confused twice here. First, the documentation that you cite[*] mentions FILE_RENAME_POSIX_SEMANTICS, but the name does not exist at all. There does exist FILE_RENAME_FLAG_POSIX_SEMANTICS. The documentation is just wrong. And in my earlier comment I copied the inexistent flag name. But I meant to cite this flag: FILE_FLAG_POSIX_SEMANTICS (no "RENAME"). It exists and is for CreateFileW(). Perhaps you also meant cite the latter one as the flag that "is not for use with `SetFileInformationByHandle()`"? At any rate, the paragraph as written isn't correct. [1]: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/ddi/ntifs/ns-ntifs-_file_rename_information -- Hannes