On 2024-08-08 13:51, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:

Cgit maintainer here...

On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 11:21:25AM -0700, Josh Steadmon wrote:

quoted

* bikeshedding on the name (yes, really). There is an active, 
unrelated
  CGit project [4] that we only recently became aware of. We 
originally
  took the name "cgit" because at $DAYJOB we sometimes refer to 
git.git
  as "cgit" to distinguish it from jgit [5].

Indeed, please find something else. Cgit is a real project, used by
many, such as git.kernel.org, and it'll turn into a real hassle for 
both
of us if there's ambiguity and confusion.

Totally agreed, naming it cgit-rs makes pretty much no sense.

What about libgit-rs? Or even libgit3, where the rustness of it is
simply an implementation detail, so the name won't feel dated 15 years
from now when everything is written in Rust anyway and -rs is so 2020s?

Well, there are still very active commercial projects written in COBOL
or Clipper, for example, so I wouldn't go as far as _everything_ being
written in Rust at some point.