Thread (42 messages) 42 messages, 3 authors, 2022-08-03

Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] log: refactor "rev.pending" code in cmd_show()

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2022-08-03 17:32:21

On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 05:33:14PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
 * We don't need the "count" and "objects" variables introduced in
   5d7eeee2ac6 (git-show: grok blobs, trees and tags, too, 2006-12-14).

   They were originally added since we'd clobber rev.pending in the
   loop without restoring it. Since the preceding commit we are
   restoring it when we handle OBJ_COMMIT, so the main for-loop can
   refer to "rev.pending" didrectly.
I think this is accurate, though it does feel a bit weird that we are
iterating over rev.pending, and we clobber and restore it mid-loop.

It's correct because of the restore, but I think that's why my gut
feeling favored the earlier approach to completely dissociate the
iteration variables from "rev.pending" before the loop even starts.

That said, it seems like we're spending a lot more time going back and
forth on this topic than it is really worth, so I can live with any of
the versions.

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help