Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] t6030-bisect-porcelain: add tests to control bisect run exit cases
From: Christian Couder <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-17 09:23:27
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 11:03 AM Bagas Sanjaya [off-list ref] wrote:
On 17/08/21 15.14, Miriam Rubio wrote:quoted
+test_expect_success 'bisect run fails with exit code equals or greater than 128' ' + write_script test_script.sh <<-\EOF && + exit 128 >/dev/null + EOF + test_must_fail git bisect run ./test_script.sh > my_bisect_log.txt +'This only checks for exit code equals to 128. You should also check for exit code greater than 128, for example 255.quoted
+ +test_expect_success 'bisect run fails with exit code smaller than 0' ' + write_script test_script.sh <<-\EOF && + exit -1 >/dev/null + EOF + test_must_fail git bisect run ./test_script.sh > my_bisect_log.txt +'This test looks OK, using -1 as representative of negative exit code. However, wording of test name can also be 'bisect run fails with negative exit code'.
Actually I am not sure that it makes sense to test an exit code smaller than 0, as POSIX exit codes are between 0 and 255 (included). For example: $ bash -c 'exit -1'; echo $? 255 $ dash -c 'exit -1'; echo $? dash: 1: exit: Illegal number: -1 2