Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] pedantic errors in next

Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón  [off-list ref] writes:

Building next with pedantic enabled shows the following 2 issues that
were originally in ew/many-alternate-optim, apologies for not catching
them earlier.

This of course affects 'master'.

The first two look trivially correct and I am tempted to take them
in -rc2; the last one, from my cursory look, I didn't see anything
wrong in it, but is not all that urgent, either.

the second one could be skipped, and has indeed another similar case
already in seen which will be send separately.

Thanks.