Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] pedantic errors in next

René Scharfe [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

would at least the two included in the chunks above be safe enough for
RC2 as I hope?, is the one with the additional int too hacky to be
considered for release?;

I think your -pedantic fixes 1 and 2 should go into the next possible
release candidate because they fix regressions.

I agree.  They are at the bottom of 'seen' just above 'master' in
last night's pushout for this exact reason.

Same for my signed-left-shift fix in
http://public-inbox.org/git/bab9f889-ee2e-d3c3-0319-e297b59261a0@web.de/
(or some improved version if it's lacking in some way) and the yet to be
published fix for the alignment issue.  I assume Andrzej as the reporter
or Eric as the original author would like to have a shot at the latter.

Thanks.  It was missed as it was buried in the discussion exchange.
Will queue together with cb/many-alternate-optim-fixup topic.