On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 12:25 PM Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Technical writing seeks to convey information with minimal
friction. One way that a reader can experience friction is if they
encounter a description of "a user" that is later simplified using a
gendered pronoun. If the reader does not consider that pronoun to
apply to them, then they can experience cognitive dissonance that
removes focus from the information.
Give some basic tips to guide us avoid unnecessary of gendered
description.
Some words seem to be missing from this sentence.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/Documentation/CodingGuidelines b/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
@@ -541,6 +541,49 @@ Writing Documentation:
+ A contributor asks their upstream to pull from them.
+
+ Note that this sounds ungrammatical and unnatural to those who
+ learned English as a second language in some parts of the world.
It also sounds ungrammatical and unnatural to this native English speaker.