Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 5 authors, 2021-06-16

Re: [PATCH 0/6] doc: replace "alice" and "bob" examples

From: Felipe Contreras <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-16 20:59:33

Junio C Hamano wrote:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason  [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
I suggested in [1] that the "alice" and "bob" examples in our
documentation would be better written without a reference to such
fictional characters, for reasons that have nothing to do with trying
to bend over backwards to avoid any reference to people's gender. It
just makes for better documentation.
I actually do not mind cast of characters with concrete names,
especially when there are more than three parties involved and
having names for them help clarify the description.  But I agree
with you that Alice and Bob should be reserved for situations where
appearance of Eve would reasonably be anticipated, or the use of
these two names become distracting to those who happen to be aware
how these characters are often used in CS literature.

Perhaps s/Alice/Tabby/ and s/Bob/Fido/ or something like that ;-)?
I don't know anybody named Tabby or Fido (or at least any human).

Maybe Mary and John, or Linda and James.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help