Derrick Stolee wrote:

On 6/11/2021 4:28 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:

quoted

Some people have a problem with using a female reviewer or a female
developer as an example, and since this is an irrelevant detail, let's
say goodbye to our illustrative female colleagues.

I find this message to be snarky and underhanded instead of
actually describing the goals at hand.

But it is accurate.

I have no problem when I read a text that uses a female reviwer as an
illustration. Apparently you do, and presumably others.

Citing the reason as stated is _not_ the purpose of these
gender-neutral recommendations.

I believe the purpose is to tailor the wording to you.

Instead, a message such as this could apply:

  Using gendered pronouns for an anonymous person applies a
  gender where none is known, and further excludes readers
  who do not use gendered pronouns.

It doesn't exclude the readers who do not use genedered pronouns.

Anna--a Finnish reader--may not use gendered pronouns herself, that
doesn't mean she automatically would have a problem when reading "she"
or "he", nor that she would feel excluded.


This patch is not for Anna--who has no problem reading an illustration
in English which uses a female colleague as illustration--this patch is
for you.

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras