Thread (66 messages) flat view 66 messages, 8 authors, 2021-06-13

Re: [PATCH] doc: replace jargon word "impact" with "effect"/"affect"

From: Felipe Contreras <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-11 19:21:47

Michal Suchánek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 04:48:58PM -0500, Varun Varada wrote:
quoted
There are a bunch of places in the code/docs which use the word "impact"
incorrectly. This is especially true of places where it says "will not
impact", which suggests that it might have an effect, albeit not as
strong of a one. This commit replaces all of these with their
appropriate alternative so that the docs not only does not use jargon,
but are also unambiguous.
Hello,

while using "will not impact" in an incorrect or unclear way may be a
problem the word "impact" in itself is not "jargon".
From Merriam-Webster:

  jargon _noun_
  : obscure and often pretentious language marked by circumlocutions and
    long words
If you are concerned about correctness and clarity of the documentation please
avoid spreading misinformation.
Under certain definition of "jaron" Varun's statement would be
incorrect, but not under all definitions. If you use the definition
I stated above, "impact" can be considered jargon, because it's a bit
obscure language.

Ultimately it doesn't matter if it's jargon or not, only that we have
better alternatives.
Thanks

Michal
Michal, can you please remove quoted lines you are not replying to?
Those 762 extra lines make it harder for some of us to read the thread.
We don't have email guidelines, but if we did, that certain would be one
of the points.

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help