On 5/4/2021 12:27 PM, Matheus Tavares wrote:> @@ -359,16 +360,22 @@ static int checkout_worktree(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
int nr_checkouts = 0, nr_unmerged = 0;
int errs = 0;
int pos;
+ int pc_workers, pc_threshold;
+ struct mem_pool ce_mem_pool;
state.force = 1;
state.refresh_cache = 1;
state.istate = &the_index;
+ mem_pool_init(&ce_mem_pool, 0);
+ get_parallel_checkout_configs(&pc_workers, &pc_threshold);
init_checkout_metadata(&state.meta, info->refname,
info->commit ? &info->commit->object.oid : &info->oid,
NULL);
enable_delayed_checkout(&state);
+ if (pc_workers > 1)
+ init_parallel_checkout();
/* TODO: audit for interaction with sparse-index. */
ensure_full_index(&the_index);
Since this context piece is new as of your rebase, I did a quick check on
all of the calls you inserted above and found them to be safe with the
sparse-index. They do not care about the number of cache entries, for
example.
Thanks,
-Stolee