Re: [PATCH 1/2] blob.c: remove buffer & size arguments to parse_blob_buffer()
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2021-04-09 17:51:21
Subsystem:
the rest · Maintainer:
Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 10:07:27AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
As noted in the comment introduced in 837d395a5c0 (Replace parse_blob() with an explanatory comment, 2010-01-18) the old parse_blob() function and the current parse_blob_buffer() exist merely to provide consistency in the API. We're not going to parse blobs like we "parse" commits, trees or tags. So let's not have the parse_blob_buffer() take arguments that pretends that we do. Its only use is to set the "parsed" flag. See bd2c39f58f9 ([PATCH] don't load and decompress objects twice with parse_object(), 2005-05-06) for the introduction of parse_blob_buffer().
OK. Calling it parse_blob_buffer() is a little silly since it doesn't even take a buffer anymore. But I guess parse_blob() might imply that it actually loads the contents from disk to check them (which the other parse_foo() functions do), so that's not a good name. So this might be the least bad thing. Given that there are only two callers, just setting blob->object.parsed might not be unreasonable, either. But I don't think it's worth spending too much time on.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ struct object *parse_object(struct repository *r, const struct object_id *oid) error(_("hash mismatch %s"), oid_to_hex(oid)); return NULL; } - parse_blob_buffer(lookup_blob(r, oid), NULL, 0); + parse_blob_buffer(lookup_blob(r, oid)); return lookup_object(r, oid);
Not new in your patch, but I wondered if this could cause a segfault
when lookup_blob() returns NULL. I _think_ the answer is "no". We'd hit
this code path when either:
- lookup_object() returns an object with type OBJ_BLOB, in which case
lookup_blob() would return that same object
- lookup_object() returned NULL, in which case lookup_blob() will call
it again, get NULL again, and then auto-create the blob and return
it
So I think it is OK. But there are a bunch of duplicate hash lookups in
this code. It would be clearer and more efficient as:
diff --git a/object.c b/object.c
index 2c32691dc4..2dfa038f13 100644
--- a/object.c
+++ b/object.c@@ -262,12 +262,14 @@ struct object *parse_object(struct repository *r, const struct object_id *oid) if ((obj && obj->type == OBJ_BLOB && repo_has_object_file(r, oid)) || (!obj && repo_has_object_file(r, oid) && oid_object_info(r, oid, NULL) == OBJ_BLOB)) { + if (!obj) + obj = create_object(r, oid, alloc_blob_node(r)); if (check_object_signature(r, repl, NULL, 0, NULL) < 0) { error(_("hash mismatch %s"), oid_to_hex(oid)); return NULL; } - parse_blob_buffer(lookup_blob(r, oid), NULL, 0); - return lookup_object(r, oid); + parse_blob_buffer(obj, NULL, 0); + return obj; } buffer = repo_read_object_file(r, oid, &type, &size);
but I doubt the efficiency matters much in practice. Those hash lookups will be lost in the noise of computing the hash of the blob contents. -Peff