On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:46:29PM +0100, Jacob Vosmaer wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 8:45 PM Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I also rage-replaced peel_ref() with a function taking an oid so we
never have to do that digging again. Posted separately in its own
thread.
That sounds like a good solution. Where does that leave my patch? Do I
need to wait for that new commit somehow? I don't know how that works,
"contributing to Git" wise.
Peff noted in the patch to nuke "peel_ref()" that merging his and then
yours will cause a merge conflict, but it is trivial to resolve. So, I'd
expect that Junio will pick up both and resolve the merge conflict when
queuing.
Or, in other words, I don't think there's anything left on your part
;-). Thanks for providing your patches; there was a nice digression and
I'm quite happy with where we ended up.
Thanks,
Taylor