Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] add -p (built-in): do not color the progress indicator separately
From: Phillip Wood <hidden>
Date: 2020-11-13 16:06:38
Hi Dscho On 13/11/2020 13:57, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi Phillip, On Fri, 13 Nov 2020, Phillip Wood wrote:quoted
On 11/11/2020 12:28, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:quoted
From: Johannes Schindelin <redacted> The Perl version of this command colors the progress indicator and the prompt message in one go, let's do the same in the built-in version.Why? the C version has access to an api that means we don't have to remember to print the reset string each time so why move away from that? I don't think it matters to the user that there are some extra escape codes in the prompt of the C version. The answer is probably "so we can use the same test as the perl version" which might be a good reason - if it is I think it would be helpful to say so in the commit message.Honestly, the number one reason is so that the _same_ test passes using the Perl version as well as with the built-in version, something that is required by the `linux-clang` job in our CI build.
That's what I assumed - it would be good to document that in the commit message.
I am not really willing to change this, unless I hear a goooood reason to complicate the test.
I guess we could change the perl version to match the C version as it is the perl version that will be retired but I'm not that fussed Best Wishes Phillip
Ciao, Dscho