Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2019-12-05

Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] Add --pathspec-from-file option

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2019-12-04 19:25:46

Alexandr Miloslavskiy [off-list ref] writes:
On 03.12.2019 17:55, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
quoted
Changes from V3:
Yikes, perhaps our mails crossed or something?  I think the previous
round is already in 'next'.

Let's wait and see they cook enough to graduate to 'master', and
build a separate series on top to teach other commands the option
using the facility introduced by the current series (which is the
first 6 patches you sent here).
My intent is to support more commands, so I was working on other
patches in the background. Today more patches were ready and I wasn't
sure whether to submit another topic or continue the old one. After
some thinking, I decided to continue the old one.
Well I've split the new patches into its own topic to queue on the
am/pathspec-f-f-checkout branch, that builds directly on top of the
am/pathspec-from-file branch, for now.  I suspect that they may want
to be two topics (i.e. for "add" and for "checkout/restore"), but
I'd like to keep them out of 'next' either way for a while until the
base topic proves to be solid enough.
Please give me an advice: when the time comes, shall I prepare even
more patches and submit a massive branch, or shall I submit today's
remaining patches, then wait again? I imagine that massive branches
are scary and will deter reviewers?
Scary will probably not be an issue for the follow-up topics around
the pathspec-from-file theme, but a huge topic tends to wear out the
author and the reviewers, inviting trivial bugs that would otherwise
be found easily go unnoticed.

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help