Thread (190 messages) 190 messages, 7 authors, 2019-11-21

Re: [PATCH v3 02/17] sparse-checkout: create 'init' subcommand

From: Elijah Newren <hidden>
Date: 2019-10-11 22:14:54

On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 1:08 PM Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
[off-list ref] wrote:
++
+The init subcommand also enables the 'extensions.worktreeConfig' setting
+and sets the `core.sparseCheckout` setting in the worktree-specific config
+file. This prevents the sparse-checkout feature from interfering with other
+worktrees.
I'm afraid that might be mis-parsed by future readers.  Perhaps something like:

The init subcommand also enables the `core.sparseCheckout` setting.
To avoid interfering with other worktrees, it first enables the
`extensions.worktreeConfig` setting and makes sure to set the
`core.sparseCheckout` setting in the worktree-specific config file.
+enum sparse_checkout_mode {
+       MODE_NONE = 0,
+       MODE_FULL = 1,
+};
So MODE_FULL is "true" and MODE_NONE is "false".  MODE_NONE seems
confusing to me, but let's keep reading...
+
+static int sc_set_config(enum sparse_checkout_mode mode)
+{
+       struct argv_array argv = ARGV_ARRAY_INIT;
+
+       if (git_config_set_gently("extensions.worktreeConfig", "true")) {
+               error(_("failed to set extensions.worktreeConfig setting"));
+               return 1;
+       }
+
+       argv_array_pushl(&argv, "config", "--worktree", "core.sparseCheckout", NULL);
+
+       if (mode)
+               argv_array_pushl(&argv, "true", NULL);
+       else
+               argv_array_pushl(&argv, "false", NULL);
Wait, what?  MODE_FULL is used to specify that you want a sparse
checkout, and MODE_NONE is used to denote that you want a full (i.e.
non-sparse) checkout?  These are *very* confusing names.

+static int sparse_checkout_init(int argc, const char **argv)
+{
+       struct pattern_list pl;
+       char *sparse_filename;
+       FILE *fp;
+       int res;
+
+       if (sc_set_config(MODE_FULL))
+               return 1;
Seems confusing here too.


Everything else in the patch looks good, though.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help