Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2018-06-27

Re: [PATCH] fetch: when deepening, check connectivity fully

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2018-06-27 20:17:41

Jonathan Tan [off-list ref] writes:
+test_expect_success 'shallow fetches check connectivity without stopping at existing refs' '
+	cp -R .git server.git &&
+
+	# Normally, the connectivity check stops at ancestors of existing refs.
+	git init client &&
+	GIT_TRACE="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client fetch "$(pwd)/server.git" &&
+	grep "run_command: git rev-list" trace >rev-list-command &&
+	grep -e "--not --all" rev-list-command &&
+
+	# But it does not for a shallow fetch...
+	rm -rf client trace &&
+	git init client &&
+	GIT_TRACE="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client fetch --depth=1 "$(pwd)/server.git" &&
+	grep "run_command: git rev-list" trace >rev-list-command &&
+	! grep -e "--not --all" rev-list-command &&
+
+	# ...and when deepening.
+	rm trace &&
+	GIT_TRACE="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client fetch --unshallow "$(pwd)/server.git" &&
+	grep "run_command: git rev-list" trace >rev-list-command &&
+	! grep -e "--not --all" rev-list-command
+'
Hmph, don't we quote these in the trace output, requiring us to grep
for "'--not' '--all'" or somesuch?  

I do not think of a better way to do the above without a huge effort
offhand, and the approach taken by the above may be the best we
could do, but it looks like quite a brittle test that knows too much
about the current implementation.  "rev-list $new_commits --not
--all" is a so very common and useful pattern that it is not all
that implausible that we may want to come up with a new option to do
so, or more likely we may want to do that with an in-process API
without spawning an external rev-list (hence making it impossible to
observe via GIT_TRACE).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help