Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] config: make config_from_gitmodules generally useful
From: Antonio Ospite <hidden>
Date: 2018-06-20 18:27:25
On Mon, 14 May 2018 18:05:19 -0700 Stefan Beller [off-list ref] wrote: Hi again Stefan,
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 3:58 AM, Antonio Ospite [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
The config_from_gitmodules() function is a good candidate for a centralized point where to read the gitmodules configuration file.It is very tempting to use that function. However it was introduced specifically to not do that. ;) See the series that was merged at 5aa0b6c506c (Merge branch 'bw/grep-recurse-submodules', 2017-08-22), specifically f20e7c1ea24 (submodule: remove submodule.fetchjobs from submodule-config parsing, 2017-08-02), where both builtin/fetch as well as the submodule helper use the pattern to read from the .gitmodules file va this function and then overlay it with the read from config.
I get that the _content_ of .gitmodules is not meant to be generic config, but I still see some value in having a single point when its _location_ is decided.
quoted
Add a repo argument to it to make the function more general, and adjust the current callers in cmd_fetch and update-clone.This could be a preparatory patch, but including it here is fine, too.
I agree, having this as a preparatory change will help focusing the review, thanks.
quoted
As a proof of the utility of the change, start using the function also in repo_read_gitmodules which was basically doing the same operations.I think they were separated for the reason outlined above, or what Brandon said in his reply. I think extending 'repo_read_gitmodules' makes sense, as that is used everywhere for the loading of submodule configuration.
I would follow Brandon's suggestion here and still use 'config_from_gitmodules' from 'repo_read_gitmodules' to avoid code duplication. I will try to be clear in the comments and in commit message when motivating the decision. Thanks for the review Stefan. Ciao, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite https://ao2.it https://twitter.com/ao2it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?