On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 04:55:56AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

In fact, that kind of makes me wonder if this "type" list should not
exist at all. If we instead grouped the options and said "these are the
type options", then we'd only need one list.

I'm OK to punt on that for now, though, in the interest of not holding
up this patch series. I do think we should say something like:

  Each type can be specified with the matching command-line option
  (e.g., `--bool`, `--int`, etc); see <<OPTIONS>> below.

I punted on this for now, since rebasing on
tb/config-type-specifier-option makes this commit a no-op.


Thanks,
Taylor