Thread (41 messages) 41 messages, 4 authors, 2018-04-10

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] builtin/config: introduce `--color` type specifier

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2018-03-26 09:16:52

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 08:55:56PM -0400, Taylor Blau wrote:
As of this commit, the canonical way to retreive an ANSI-compatible
color escape sequence from a configuration file is with the
`--get-color` action.
s/retreive/retrieve/
This is to allow Git to "fall back" on a default value for the color
should the given section not exist in the specified configuration(s).

With the addition of `--default`, this is no longer needed since:

  $ git config --default red --color core.section

will be have exactly as:

  $ git config --get-color core.section red

For consistency, let's introduce `--color` and encourage `--color`,
`--default` together over `--get-color` alone.
I don't think we'll ever get rid of --get-color (at the very least, we'd
need a deprecation period). But it's probably worth adding a note under
the --get-color description to mention that it's a historical synonym,
and that using "--default" should be preferred.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -90,6 +91,7 @@ static struct option builtin_config_options[] = {
 	OPT_BIT(0, "bool-or-int", &types, N_("value is --bool or --int"), TYPE_BOOL_OR_INT),
 	OPT_BIT(0, "path", &types, N_("value is a path (file or directory name)"), TYPE_PATH),
 	OPT_BIT(0, "expiry-date", &types, N_("value is an expiry date"), TYPE_EXPIRY_DATE),
+	OPT_BIT(0, "color", &types, N_("value is a color"), TYPE_COLOR),
 	OPT_GROUP(N_("Other")),
 	OPT_BOOL('z', "null", &end_null, N_("terminate values with NUL byte")),
 	OPT_BOOL(0, "name-only", &omit_values, N_("show variable names only")),
I just had a funny thought. Normally in Git the "--color" option means
"colorize the output". And we are diverging from that here. I wonder if
anybody would be confused by that, or if we would ever want to later add
an option to colorize git-config output. Would we regret squatting on
--color?

I'm not sure what else to name it. Anything _except_ "--color" would
diverge from the existing scheme of "--<type>".

If we were designing from scratch, I'd consider:

  git config --type=int ...
  git config --type=color ...

etc. I'm not sure if it's worth trying to switch now (on the other hand,
it resolves the documentation issue I mentioned earlier, since that
would naturally group all of the types ;) ).

It would be pretty easy to declare "--type" as the Right Way, and list
"--int" as a historical synonym for "--type=int".
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -175,6 +177,11 @@ static int format_config(struct strbuf *buf, const char *key_, const char *value
 			if (git_config_expiry_date(&t, key_, value_) < 0)
 				return -1;
 			strbuf_addf(buf, "%"PRItime, t);
+		} else if (types == TYPE_COLOR) {
+			char v[COLOR_MAXLEN];
+			if (git_config_color(v, key_, value_) < 0)
+				return -1;
+			strbuf_addstr(buf, v);
Looks good.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -320,6 +327,12 @@ static char *normalize_value(const char *key, const char *value)
 		else
 			return xstrdup(v ? "true" : "false");
 	}
+	if (types == TYPE_COLOR) {
+		char v[COLOR_MAXLEN];
+		if (!git_config_color(v, key, value))
+			return xstrdup(value);
+		die("cannot parse color '%s'", value);
+	}
Interesting. This doesn't actually normalize anything, since we always
pass back the original value (or die). I think that's the right thing to
do, since otherwise you'd end up with ANSI codes in your config file.

I wondered at first if this should go in the "noop" normalization that
TYPE_PATH undergoes. But I like that it actually sanity-checks the
value. We should probably have a comment here explaining that yes, we
parse and then throw away the value (similar to the one near TYPE_PATH).

I suspect that TYPE_EXPIRY_DATE should do the same thing (parse and
complain if you fed nonsense, but always keep the original value).
+test_expect_success 'get --color' '
+	rm .git/config &&
+	git config foo.color "red" &&
+	git config --get --color foo.color | test_decode_color >actual &&
+	echo "<RED>" >expect &&
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
We should probably write this as:

  git config --get --color foo.color >actual.raw &&
  test_decode_color <actual.raw >actual

to catch failures from git-config itself (there's a lot of old tests
which pipe, but we've been trying to convert them to be more careful).
+test_expect_success 'set --color' '
+	rm .git/config &&
+	git config --color foo.color "red" &&
+	test_cmp expect .git/config
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'get --color barfs on non-color' '
+	echo "[foo]bar=not-a-color" >.git/config &&
+	test_must_fail git config --get --color foo.bar
+'
After reading the normalize bits above, I think there's one more case to
cover:

  test_must_fail git config --color foo.color not-a-color
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/t/t1310-config-default.sh b/t/t1310-config-default.sh
index 0e464c206..0ebece7d2 100755
--- a/t/t1310-config-default.sh
+++ b/t/t1310-config-default.sh
@@ -62,6 +62,12 @@ test_expect_success 'marshal default value as expiry-date' '
 	test_cmp expect actual
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'marshal default value as color' '
+	echo "\033[31m" >expect &&
+	git config --default red --color core.foo >actual &&
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
I don't offhand recall whether octal escapes with "echo" are portable.
It _is_ in POSIX, but only for XSI. I think using "printf" would be
portable.

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help