Thread (115 messages) flat view 115 messages, 7 authors, 2018-02-27

Re: [PATCHv2 00/16] Moving global state into the repository object (part 1)

From: Brandon Williams <hidden>
Date: 2018-02-20 19:00:20

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On 02/20, Stefan Beller wrote:
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi,

Stefan Beller wrote:
quoted
v2:
* duplicated the 'ignore_env' bit into the object store as well
* the #define trick no longer works as we do not have a "the_objectstore" global,
  which means there is just one patch per function that is converted.
  As this follows the same structure of the previous series, I am still confident
  there is no hidden dependencies to globals outside the object store in these
  converted functions.
* rebased on top of current master, resolving the merge conflicts.
  I think I used the list.h APIs right, but please double check.
For what it's worth, I think I prefer v1.  I put some comments on why
on patch 0 of v1 and would be interested in your thoughts on them
(e.g. as a reply to that).  I also think that even if we want to
switch to a style that passes around object_store separately from
repository, it is easier to do the migration in two steps: first get
rid of hidden dependencies on the_repository, then do the (simpler)
automatic migration from

 f(the_repository)

to

 f(the_repository->object_store)

*afterwards*.

Thoughts?
I would prefer to not spend more time on these conversions.
If Duy and you would come to a conclusion to either pick this
or the previous version I would be happy.

I do not see the benefit in splitting up the series even further and
do this multistep f(repo) -> f(object store), as the cost in potential
merge conflicts is too high. Note that brian just sent another object
id conversion series, also touching sha1_file.c, which I am sure will
produce merge conflicts for Junio.

For the next part 2 and onwards I'd be happy to take either this
strategy or Duys strategy as requested.
I think Jonathan is trying to point out that converting to f(repo) maybe
easier than converting to f(repo->object_store) upfront which would make
it easier to write the patches (which most of them are already written)
and to review because you can use the #define trick to make some sort of
guarantees.

After we have successfully completed the migration to f(repo), then we
can revisit the subsystems which want to have a clearer abstraction
layer and make the jump to f(repo->object_store).

-- 
Brandon Williams
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help