Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] convert: add 'working-tree-encoding' attribute
From: Simon Ruderich <hidden>
Date: 2018-01-23 09:27:56
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 01:35:25PM +0100, Lars Schneider wrote:
quoted
quoted
+ enc->name = xstrdup_toupper(value); /* aways use upper case names! */"aways" -> "always" and I think the comment should say why uppercase is important.Would that be better? /* Aways use upper case names to simplify subsequent string comparison. */ enc->name = xstrdup_toupper(value); AFAIK uppercase and lowercase names are both valid. I just wanted to ensure that we use one consistent casing. That reads better in error messages and I don't need to check for the letter case in has_prohibited_utf_bom() and friends in utf8.c
Sounds good (minus the "Aways" typo Eric already noticed).
quoted
Micro-nit: For consistency with the previous test, remove the empty line and comment (or just keep the files generated from the "setup test repo" phase and don't explicitly delete them)?I would rather add a new line and a comment to the previous test to be consistent. I know we could leave the files but these lingering files could always surprise writers of future tests (at least they surprised me in other tests).
Sure, that sounds good. Just noticed the inconsistency and wanted to mention it. Regards Simon -- + privacy is necessary + using gnupg http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9