On 29 Jun 2017, at 20:34, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
You seem to have squashed an unrelated "table-driven" clean-up into
this step. While I think the end result looks good, I would have
liked to see it as a separate step, either as a preparatory "now we
are going to add the third one, let's make it table-driven before
doing so" step, or a follow-up "now we have done everything we
wanted to do, let's make this clean-up at the end" step.
I am sorry. That was a misunderstanding - I thought you want to have
this change squashed.
The "preparatory" patch sounds good!
Would you be OK if I send a v9 with this change?
Thanks,
Lars