@@ -235,14 +235,14 @@ static int checkout_merged(int pos, const struct checkout *state)
 	/*
 	 * NEEDSWORK:
 	 * There is absolutely no reason to write this as a blob object
-	 * and create a phony cache entry just to leak.  This hack is
-	 * primarily to get to the write_entry() machinery that massages
-	 * the contents to work-tree format and writes out which only
-	 * allows it for a cache entry.  The code in write_entry() needs
-	 * to be refactored to allow us to feed a <buffer, size, mode>
-	 * instead of a cache entry.  Such a refactoring would help
-	 * merge_recursive as well (it also writes the merge result to the
-	 * object database even when it may contain conflicts).
+	 * and create a phony cache entry.  This hack is primarily to get
+	 * to the write_entry() machinery that massages the contents to
+	 * work-tree format and writes out which only allows it for a
+	 * cache entry.  The code in write_entry() needs to be refactored
+	 * to allow us to feed a <buffer, size, mode> instead of a cache
+	 * entry.  Such a refactoring would help merge_recursive as well
+	 * (it also writes the merge result to the object database even
+	 * when it may contain conflicts).
 	 */
 	if (write_sha1_file(result_buf.ptr, result_buf.size,
 			    blob_type, oid.hash))

@@ -251,6 +251,7 @@ static int checkout_merged(int pos, const struct checkout *state)
 	if (!ce)
 		die(_("make_cache_entry failed for path '%s'"), path);
 	status = checkout_entry(ce, state, NULL);
+	free(ce);
 	return status;
 }