Thread (151 messages) 151 messages, 6 authors, 2017-05-11

Re: [PATCH 00/26] Address a couple of issues identified by Coverity

From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2017-04-28 11:37:11

Hi Hannes,

On Thu, 27 Apr 2017, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Am 26.04.2017 um 22:19 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
quoted
I recently registered the git-for-windows fork with Coverity to ensure
that even the Windows-specific patches get some static analysis love.

While at it, I squashed a couple of obvious issues in the part that is
not Windows-specific.
Thanks for the fish. I'd looked at the series and had a few comments.

Hunting memory leaks is the way to insanity.
I hear you. Loud and clear.
Never again am I going to help with this.
Awww? And here I thought I had your attention... *sniffle*

;-)
I prefer to rewrite this codebase to C++ and have leak-free code by
design.
I had the pleasure of working with some software developers in 2004 who
were experts at introducing memory leaks into C++ code.

The same bunch of people later produced Java code that sorted a string
list in cubic time (carefully avoiding java.util.Collections.sort(), of
course).

For every fool-proof system invented, somebody invents a better fool.

Ciao,
Dscho
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help