On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:55 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

Michael J Gruber [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Are we at a point where we can still rename the new feature at least? If
yes, and keeping everything else is mandatory, than "workspace" or
"working space" may be a serious contender for naming the new thing.

I do not have a good answer to the first question, but workspace
does sound like a good name for what this feature is trying to
achieve.

Now is not too late to rename the command from worktree to workspace
(and keep "worktree" as an alias that will be eventually deleted).
Should we do it? I would keep file names, function names... unchanged
though, not worth the amount of new conflicts.
-- 
Duy