Re: bw/transport-protocol-policy
flat view
From: Brandon Williams <hidden>
Date: 2016-12-01 18:14:28
Subsystem:
the rest · Maintainer:
Linus Torvalds
On 12/01, Jeff King wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 04:15:08PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:quoted
* bw/transport-protocol-policy (2016-11-09) 2 commits (merged to 'next' on 2016-11-16 at 1391d3eeed) + transport: add protocol policy config option + lib-proto-disable: variable name fix Finer-grained control of what protocols are allowed for transports during clone/fetch/push have been enabled via a new configuration mechanism. Will cook in 'next'.I was looking at the way the http code feeds protocol restrictions to CURLOPT_REDIR_PROTOCOLS, and I think this topic is missing two elements: 1. The new policy config lets you say "only allow this protocol when the user specifies it". But when http.c calls is_transport_allowed(), the latter has no idea that we are asking it about potential redirects (which obviously do _not_ come from the user), and would erroneously allow them. I think this needs fixed before the topic is merged. It's not a regression, as it only comes into play if you use the new policy config. But it is a minor security hole in the new feature.
I agree and it should be an easy fix. We can just add a parameter like so:
diff --git a/transport.c b/transport.c
index 2c0ec76..d38d50f 100644
--- a/transport.c
+++ b/transport.c@@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ static enum protocol_allow_config get_protocol_config(const char *type) return PROTOCOL_ALLOW_USER_ONLY; } -int is_transport_allowed(const char *type) +int is_transport_allowed(const char *type, int redirect) { const struct string_list *whitelist = protocol_whitelist(); if (whitelist)
@@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ int is_transport_allowed(const char *type) case PROTOCOL_ALLOW_NEVER: return 0; case PROTOCOL_ALLOW_USER_ONLY: - return git_env_bool("GIT_PROTOCOL_FROM_USER", 1); + return git_env_bool("GIT_PROTOCOL_FROM_USER", !redirect); } die("BUG: invalid protocol_allow_config type");
That way the libcurl code can say it is asking if it is ok to redirect to that protocol.
2. If your curl is too old to support CURLOPT_REDIR_PROTOCOLS, we will
warn if there is a protocol whitelist in effect. But that check
only covers the environment whitelist, and we do not warn if you
restrict other protocols.
I actually think this should probably just warn indiscriminately.
Even without a Git protocol whitelist specified, the code serves to
prevent curl from redirecting to bizarre protocols like smtp. The
affected curl versions are from 2009 and prior, so I kind of doubt
it matters much either way (I'm actually tempted to suggest we bump
the minimum curl version there; there's a ton of #ifdef cruft going
back to 2002-era versions of libcurl).We should switch to warning all the time since this series adds in default whitelisted/blacklisted protocols anyways. -- Brandon Williams