Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 3 authors, 2016-11-09
STALE3539d
Revisions (6)
  1. rfc [diff vs current]
  2. v1 current
  3. v2 [diff vs current]
  4. v3 [diff vs current]
  5. v4 [diff vs current]
  6. v5 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v1 05/19] update-index: warn in case of split-index incoherency

From: Christian Couder <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-23 09:27:29
Subsystem: the rest · Maintainer: Linus Torvalds

When users are using `git update-index --(no-)split-index`, they
may expect the split-index feature to be used or not according to
the option they just used, but this might not be the case if the
new "core.splitIndex" config variable has been set. In this case
let's warn about what will happen and why.

Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <redacted>
---
 builtin/update-index.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/builtin/update-index.c b/builtin/update-index.c
index b75ea03..a14dbf2 100644
--- a/builtin/update-index.c
+++ b/builtin/update-index.c
@@ -1098,12 +1098,21 @@ int cmd_update_index(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
 	}
 
 	if (split_index > 0) {
+		if (git_config_get_split_index() == 0)
+			warning("core.splitIndex is set to false; "
+				"remove or change it, if you really want to "
+				"enable split index");
 		if (the_index.split_index)
 			the_index.cache_changed |= SPLIT_INDEX_ORDERED;
 		else
 			add_split_index(&the_index);
-	} else if (!split_index)
+	} else if (!split_index) {
+		if (git_config_get_split_index() == 1)
+			warning("core.splitIndex is set to true; "
+				"remove or change it, if you really want to "
+				"disable split index");
 		remove_split_index(&the_index);
+	}
 
 	switch (untracked_cache) {
 	case UC_UNSPECIFIED:
-- 
2.10.1.462.g7e1e03a
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help