Re: VCS comparison table
From: Aaron Bentley <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 19:52:28
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Ericsson wrote:
The only issue I have with bzr's revno's and truly distributed setup is that, by looking at the table, it seems to claim that you have found some miraculous way to make revnos work without a central server. Since everyone agrees that they don't, this should IMO be listed as mutually exclusive features.
The "simple namespace" is both a URL and a revno. And therefore, it's just as distributed and decentralized as the web. There is very little difference between this: http://example.com/mywebpage#5 And this: http://example.com/mybranch 5 In fact, we've been planning to unify them into one identifier. Aaron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFQLxr0F+nu1YWqI0RAiVrAJ9rb+uylIuxqMo2VMelI3Qm6oNQOwCfeTAb kOkp9kOkRl1YEVEP+G3y2SU= =Zgsg