Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
--- a/send-pack.c
+++ b/send-pack.c
@@ -36,18 +36,15 @@ int option_parse_push_signed(const struct option *opt,
die("bad %s argument: %s", opt->long_name, arg);
}
-static int feed_object(const unsigned char *sha1, int fd, int negative)
+static void feed_object(const unsigned char *sha1, FILE *fh, int negative)
{
- char buf[42];
-
if (negative && !has_sha1_file(sha1))
- return 1;
+ return;
[...]
quoted hunk
@@ -97,21 +95,22 @@ static int pack_objects(int fd, struct ref *refs, struct sha1_array *extra, stru
[...]
quoted hunk
for (i = 0; i < extra->nr; i++)
- if (!feed_object(extra->sha1[i], po.in, 1))
- break;
+ feed_object(extra->sha1[i], po_in, 1);
I may have missed the obvious, but doesn't this change the behavior when
"negative && !has_sha1_file(sha1)" happens? I understand that you don't
need write_or_whine anymore, but don't understand how you get rid of the
"return 1" here.
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/