for (i = 0; i < extra->nr; i++)
- if (!feed_object(extra->sha1[i], po.in, 1))
- break;
+ feed_object(extra->sha1[i], po_in, 1);
I may have missed the obvious, but doesn't this change the behavior when
"negative && !has_sha1_file(sha1)" happens? I understand that you don't
need write_or_whine anymore, but don't understand how you get rid of the
"return 1" here.
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
for (i = 0; i < extra->nr; i++)
- if (!feed_object(extra->sha1[i], po.in, 1))
- break;
+ feed_object(extra->sha1[i], po_in, 1);
I may have missed the obvious, but doesn't this change the behavior when
"negative && !has_sha1_file(sha1)" happens? I understand that you don't
need write_or_whine anymore, but don't understand how you get rid of the
"return 1" here.
Just FYI, this patch removes the last use of write_or_whine() - should it
be removed?
ATB,
Ramsay Jones