Hey Johannes,
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Johannes Schindelin
[off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Pranit,
On Sat, 14 May 2016, Pranit Bauva wrote:
quoted
Reimplement the `bisect_voc` shell function in C. This is a too small
function to be called as a subcommand though the working of this
function has been tested by calling it as a subcommand.
This leaves me puzzled as to what this patch is supposed to do. Maybe
rename this function to have a more intuitive name, and then throw in a
patch that makes use of the function?
Are you suggesting to first have an introductory patch which will
rename the function in the shell script and then this patch which will
convert the "new" shell function to C? I can do this. I have to think
of a nice name. How does 'good_or_bad" sound?
Regards,
Pranit Bauva