On 15/02/16 21:40, Jeff King wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 09:36:23PM +0000, Ramsay Jones wrote:
quoted
quoted
+test_expect_success '--show-origin stdin' '
+ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
+ stdin: user.custom=true
So, as with the previous patch, I think this should be:
file:<stdin> user.custom=true
That's ambiguous with a file named "<stdin>", which was the point of
having the two separate prefixes in the first place.
I think in practice we _could_ get by with an ambiguous output (it's not
like "<stdin>" is a common filename), but that was discussed earlier in
the thread, and Lars decided to go for something unambiguous.
sure, I just don't think it would cause a problem in practice.
How about using '-' for <stdin>? Hmm, you can actually create
such a file in the filesystem! Oh well, I guess its not a big deal.
That doesn't necessarily have to bleed over into the error messages,
though (which could continue to use "<stdin>" if we want to put in a
little extra code to covering the cases separately.
Yep.
ATB,
Ramsay Jones