Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] merge-file: let conflict markers match end-of-line style of the context
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:07:55
Hi Junio, On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:quoted
quoted
Just in case it was unclear, none of the comment above means I want any part of the patch redone--I am happy with this patch as-is.Thanks for saying that... I was about to try to make things clearer, but I could not think of a better term than "needs_cr".I don't, either ;-). The primary reason I respond with the "I find this a bit confusing but it probably is just me" (not just to this patch) is to give an example of a review comment that demonstrates to the others that the reviewer understood what is in the patch and the issues around the change better than a mere unsubstantiated "These look OK to me.", which does not tell us how carefully the proposed change was reviewed by the reviewer--such a review does not allow me to "trust the review that is already done by others" and apply the patches with minimum cursory scanning and I end up having to carefully read them myself.
Your response is also an indicator to me that future myself will find the same code just as confusing as you did, though. Maybe need_cr -> eol_is_crlf? Ciao, Dscho