Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Just in case it was unclear, none of the comment above means I want
any part of the patch redone--I am happy with this patch as-is.
Thanks for saying that... I was about to try to make things clearer, but I
could not think of a better term than "needs_cr".
I don't, either ;-).
The primary reason I respond with the "I find this a bit confusing
but it probably is just me" (not just to this patch) is to give an
example of a review comment that demonstrates to the others that the
reviewer understood what is in the patch and the issues around the
change better than a mere unsubstantiated "These look OK to me.",
which does not tell us how carefully the proposed change was
reviewed by the reviewer--such a review does not allow me to "trust
the review that is already done by others" and apply the patches
with minimum cursory scanning and I end up having to carefully read
them myself.