Thread (34 messages) flat view 34 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] ref-filter: introduce align_atom_parser()

From: Eric Sunshine <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:07:29

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Karthik Nayak [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Introduce align_atom_parser() which will parse an "align" atom and
store the required alignment position and width in the "use_atom"
structure for further usage in 'populate_value()'.

Helped-by: Ramsay Jones [off-list ref]
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <redacted>
---
diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
@@ -63,6 +69,49 @@ static void color_atom_parser(struct used_atom *atom)
+static align_type parse_align_position(const char *s)
+{
+       if (!strcmp(s, "right"))
+               return ALIGN_RIGHT;
+       else if (!strcmp(s, "middle"))
+               return ALIGN_MIDDLE;
+       else if (!strcmp(s, "left"))
+               return ALIGN_LEFT;
+       return -1;
+}
+
+static void align_atom_parser(struct used_atom *atom)
+{
+       struct align *align = &atom->u.align;
+       const char *buf = NULL;
+       struct strbuf **s, **to_free;
+       int width = -1;
+
+       match_atom_name(atom->str, "align", &buf);
+       if (!buf)
+               die(_("expected format: %%(align:<width>,<position>)"));
+       s = to_free = strbuf_split_str_omit_term(buf, ',', 0);
+
+       align->position = ALIGN_LEFT;
+
+       while (*s) {
+               int position;
+
+               if (!strtoul_ui(s[0]->buf, 10, (unsigned int *)&width))
This casting is pretty ugly. It probably would be cleaner to declare
'width' as 'unsigned int' and initialize it with ~0U than to do this
ugly and potentially dangerous casting. Likewise, below where you
check 'width < 0', you'd check instead for ~0U. However, such a change
should not be part of the current patch, but rather as a separate
preparatory patch.
+                       ;
+               else if ((position = parse_align_position(s[0]->buf)) > 0)
Shouldn't this be '>=' rather than '>'?

This likely would have been easier to spot if parse_align_position()
had been factored out in its own patch, as suggested by my v1
review[1], since the caller would have been trivially inspectable
rather than having to keep track of both code movement and changes.

[1]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/281916
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+                       align->position = position;
+               else
+                       die(_("unrecognized %%(align) argument: %s"), s[0]->buf);
+               s++;
+       }
+
+       if (width < 0)
+               die(_("positive width expected with the %%(align) atom"));
+       align->width = width;
+       strbuf_list_free(to_free);
+}
+
 static struct {
        const char *name;
        cmp_type cmp_type;
@@ -880,35 +924,7 @@ static void populate_value(struct ref_array_item *ref)
                                v->s = " ";
                        continue;
                } else if (match_atom_name(name, "align", &valp)) {
-                       struct align *align = &v->u.align;
-                       struct strbuf **s, **to_free;
-                       int width = -1;
-
-                       if (!valp)
-                               die(_("expected format: %%(align:<width>,<position>)"));
-
-                       s = to_free = strbuf_split_str_omit_term(valp, ',', 0);
-
-                       align->position = ALIGN_LEFT;
-
-                       while (*s) {
-                               if (!strtoul_ui(s[0]->buf, 10, (unsigned int *)&width))
-                                       ;
-                               else if (!strcmp(s[0]->buf, "left"))
-                                       align->position = ALIGN_LEFT;
-                               else if (!strcmp(s[0]->buf, "right"))
-                                       align->position = ALIGN_RIGHT;
-                               else if (!strcmp(s[0]->buf, "middle"))
-                                       align->position = ALIGN_MIDDLE;
-                               else
-                                       die(_("improper format entered align:%s"), s[0]->buf);
-                               s++;
-                       }
-
-                       if (width < 0)
-                               die(_("positive width expected with the %%(align) atom"));
-                       align->width = width;
-                       strbuf_list_free(to_free);
+                       v->u.align = atom->u.align;
                        v->handler = align_atom_handler;
                        continue;
                } else if (!strcmp(name, "end")) {
--
2.6.4
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help